The phrase "a large omission in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a significant gap or missing information in a particular context, such as a report, discussion, or analysis.
Example: "The report had a large omission in the data analysis section, which affected the overall conclusions drawn."
Alternatives: "a significant gap in" or "a major oversight in".
This is a large omission: in 1990-94 America's current spending on education (excluding money for buildings and the rest) was 6.6% of GDP, compared with an average of 5.6% in 12 other rich countries.
It has no heart rate monitor, a large omission in a world where even the cheapest devices can tell how hard you're working, but it does have a 1.5″ 360×360 circular transflective LTPS LCD display that can go into lower power mode so you can read the time at all times.
By counting the lines and calculating how much space would be required to include John 7 53-8 11, it can be demonstrated that, barring a large omission elsewhere in the text on the missing leaves, they did not contain sufficient space to include the passage.
That's a big omission, in my opinion.
Your Page 1 article on May 28 ["The Island's Nuclear-Tipped Past"] had a very large omission.
If we consider that omission responses uncover the underlying predictions, this second level prediction would also be responsible for larger omission responses in the same time window in xxxxy blocks, as this prediction would only be present in these blocks, increasing the magnitude of prediction-related activity.
Similarly, omission plays a large part in Crane's work; the names of his protagonists are not commonly used and sometimes they are not named at all.
As with the other detection methods, omission of Mg2+ caused a large decrease in the nitrosothiol yield to 488±61 nM GSNO.
These findings are also likely to have a broader application to expression studies of other genes using precious archival or fresh blood samples with a large variation in rRNA quality where sample omission is not an option.
Written over a period of 50 years, the stories read to some extent like a diary, capturing an emotional landscape in lucid detail even while betraying startlingly large omissions.
There were, though, large omissions and ambiguities that will need to be filled in and clarified as polling day nears.
