The phrase "a large improvement compared" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the extent of improvement in relation to something else, often in a comparative context.
Example: "The new software update has resulted in a large improvement compared to the previous version, enhancing user experience significantly."
Alternatives: "a significant enhancement relative to" or "a considerable upgrade in comparison to".
The scheme has been tested on previously proven (by comparison to WAMS measurements) dynamic model of a part of a Slovenian power system and the results indicate a large improvement compared to the traditional scheme.
This shows a large improvement compared with a recent report of 5-10 mg/L T.e.CBH1 [ 24].
Reviewer 1: Dr. Purificacion Lopez-Garcia, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France This manuscript presents an update of the archaeal cluster of orthologous genes (arCOGs) based on 120 archaeal genome sequences which, although still limited face to the wide archaeal diversity, is a large improvement compared to the initial set of genomes used to define the first arCOGs.
During the second study period, audits were performed for only three months as, out of the 23 technological equipment/procedures included in the initial study, only the infusion pumps were being audited and because the results obtained showed a large improvement compared to the first period.
They illustrate the overall difference in the factorial coordinates on the "visual functioning and satisfaction" factor, indicating an improvement in both treatment groups after the 1st eye surgery and after the 2nd eye surgery, with the ReSTOR® group tending to show a larger improvement compared to the mono-focal group.
From a genetic perspective, Brunoni and colleagues demonstrated that the 5-HTTLPR serotonin transporter polymorphism predicted the treatment response to tDCS treatment for depression, where long/long homozygotes displayed a larger improvement compared to short allele carriers, in a dose response manner [ 82].
This represents a very large improvement compared to the previous methods (about 20%), which likely occurs because the motif-based approach reduces the false positives of the disorder-based approach and vice versa.
The lowest detection probability was obtained without modeling, the inclusion of TOF resulted in a somewhat larger improvement compared to system modeling.
Again, both MPH groups showed a significantly larger improvement compared with placebo, and the decrease in CAARS:O-SV score over time was different between the treatment groups.
Dose ordering was observed across QD doses for trough FVC and weighted mean FVC with UMEC 125 μg, showing the largest improvements compared with placebo.
