The phrase "a large group of workers" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a significant number of employees or laborers in a specific context, such as in discussions about labor, workforce, or organizational structure.
Example: "The company decided to implement new safety protocols after a large group of workers raised concerns about their working conditions."
Alternatives: "a significant number of employees" or "a considerable workforce."
The administrative costs of insurance are high when they aren't spread over a large group of workers.
On a windy winter afternoon, a large group of workers hurried to finish erecting a stage in front of the Hector Pieterson Memorial and Museum in preparation for the annual Youth Day celebration.
Toward the end, a large group of workers dressed as cowboys roasts marshmallows at a party in the new dining hall; it's a colorful moment, but they could be anywhere.
A15 SCIENCE/HEALTH Study Cites Danger in Benzene The first study of a large group of workers breathing air with very low levels of benzene suggests that the chemical may harm the bone marrow, even in amounts below the threshold deemed safe under American law.
The CEO of a renowned electrical-engineering firm, for instance, wanted to change the corporate culture to be more receptive to new ideas, so he separated a large group of workers into teams of ten, asking each team to come up with ten ideas for improving the business.
Economists warned that long-term unemployment could be transformed in the next few years into structural unemployment, meaning that the problem is not just too few jobs and too many job seekers, but a large group of workers who no longer match employers' needs or are no longer considered employable.
Bee swarms form when a queen bee strikes out with a large group of worker bees to form a new colony.
In economic terms, their supply had increased, which meant that the wage premium that came with a diploma was now spread among a larger group of workers.
Some observers, however, may be concerned that coverage and level of protection necessarily embed trade-offs: high levels of protection cannot be afforded to all, while relatively low levels of protection can be granted to a larger group of workers more easily (Boeri and Van Ours, 2008).
Minimum permissible hours reductions are intended to limit STW participation to firms experiencing important financial difficulties, while maximum average hours reductions rule out temporary layoffs and foster work-sharing by spreading the burden of adjustment across a larger group of workers.
Few longitudinal studies have been performed to investigate the risk factors responsible for the incidence of hand, arm, shoulder and neck symptoms among office workers, given the observation that a large group of office workers might be at risk worldwide.
