Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a large f is" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are describing a significant or notable instance of something represented by "f," such as a variable or a concept in a discussion.
Example: "In the equation, a large f is necessary to achieve the desired outcome."
Alternatives: "a significant f is" or "a considerable f is".
Exact(1)
Hence a large f is better in such a situation.
Similar(59)
In general, a larger F is helpful to encourage global searching in the initial period of iteration, however, at the cost of poor local searching in the later period.
An even larger f is theoretically preferred, but it may generate less accurate results due to the limited precisions of FBA and MOMA.
It is seen that the SHmax orientations having a large F value are generally in a narrow range between NW-SE to NNW-SSE.
The length of the line is proportional to the value of F so that results with a large F value are relatively compared.
A large F value and small p value is indicative that the independent variables have a significant impact on the respective response variables [49].
f is nondecreasing on U and ( − 1 ) m a n ≥ 0 for large n, f is nonincreasing on U and ( − 1 ) m a n ≤ 0 for large n, f is continuous on U. Then there exists a solution x of (E) such that x ∈ y + A ( p ). Proof For x ∈ SQ let x ¯ = f ∘ x ∘ σ.
The absorbance of the films with dye adsorption (samples A to F) is larger than that of the films without dye adsorption.
The compound with the larger R f is less polar because it interacts less strongly with the polar adsorbent on the TLC plate.
If transfers can be large, f can be implemented in a game with perfect information when there are at least two players under a boundedness assumption.
I simply use a large g value to represent a larger f value, since the larger g is, the more forward scattering there is.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com