Sentence examples for a lack of impartiality from inspiring English sources
The phrase "a lack of impartiality" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used when discussing situations where fairness or neutrality is absent, often in contexts like journalism, legal matters, or decision-making processes. Example: "The judge's ruling was questioned due to a lack of impartiality in the proceedings."
Two judges previously barred Hartmann from acting as legal adviser for a lack of impartiality.
The shooting is being investigated by a group of 15 officers from neighbouring police forces, sparking criticisms of a lack of impartiality.
A lack of impartiality in organisations investigating their own conduct and an absence of accountability to an external body was also reported.
Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, said the coordinated effort between the White House and Republican intelligence chiefs in Congress "certainly gives the appearance if not the reality of a lack of impartiality".
The "Let Me Go" singer may have celebrated his first solo album in 14 years reaching number two last night, but now complaints are being made about over-exposure and a lack of impartiality.
[People felt] 'It's a choice between Cameron and Brown and however much I like Clegg I've got to choose between them.'" After five years in the job, Robinson is a familiar face, but unlike his predecessor, Andrew Marr (who was also accused of a lack of impartiality, but by rightwingers), he fails to inspire affection.
Wouldn't that be an indication of bias, of a lack of scientific impartiality?
In a scathing critique, during which he quoted Nelson Mandela, Shakespeare and the Koran, Mr. Anwar said Mr. Diah had demonstrated a "complete lack of impartiality".
That court spoke of 'the excessive injection of the trial judge into the examination of witnesses, his numerous comments to defense counsel, indicating at times hostility, though under provocation,' which it concluded 'demonstrated a bias and lack of impartiality'.
The evidence, Chan said, suggests an explanation: The lack of impartiality on the committee is offset by the finding that the information members contribute to the price-setting process is of higher quality than input from neutral advisers.
It has resulted in Arizona judges disqualifying themselves from dealing with the case because of a conflict of interest and/or lack of impartiality.
