The phrase "a kind of wrong" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or action that is not entirely right or acceptable, often implying a nuanced or subjective judgment.
Example: "What he did was a kind of wrong that can't easily be defined by the law."
Alternatives: "a sort of injustice" or "a type of error".
In contrast, discrimination is a kind of wrong that is found in systems that are liberal democratic but imperfectly so: it is the characteristic injustice of liberal democracy.
Even if mutually beneficial expoitation is a serious moral wrong, however, it might not be a kind of wrong that can justify state intervention.
However, the concept of discrimination has proved to be a useful one, at the national and international levels, for representing in thought and combating in action a kind of wrong that is deeply entrenched in human social relations.
Is it one from which we should be able to expect the protection of our fellow citizens (which is to ask whether it is a wrong from which we should be able to expect to be categorically safe as we go about our normal lives, rather than a kind of wrong that we can be expected to risk on condition that we can seek compensation if we suffer it)?
The piece opens with a kind of wrong-note, nasal fanfare, abruptly cut off.
Thus any kind of wrong move is like white open-toe shoes after Labor Day.
The concept of discrimination provides an explicit way of thinking about a certain kind of wrong that can be found in virtually every society and era.
The desert basis has already been discussed in section 2.2: a certain kind of wrong.
The lovers he evokes are a kind of oxymoron, "ever wrong from the start, however right / for the act, melting / together yet somehow sadly apart".
The idea of the slime-god forever sleeping in his underwater city of R'lyeh rendered as a soft toy is all kinds of wrong.
I've been bawled out for doing all kinds of wrong on a football pitch but never this.
