The phrase "a kind of audacity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a certain level of boldness or daring behavior that is somewhat surprising or unexpected.
Example: "Her decision to confront the CEO about the company's policies showed a kind of audacity that many of her colleagues admired."
Alternatives: "a form of boldness" or "a type of daringness."
Frame's authority is a kind of audacity, but a sly audacity, strangely wistful, strangely desperate.
Perhaps there is something naive about this - but there is also a kind of audacity and fidelity to experience.
There is a kind of audacity to even putting something on the page, a danger of conflating personal feelings with something so much larger in a way that's offensive.
So what is it that we with a kind of thoughtful audacity can warrant through the year 2001?
But the prospect pushes against the traditional culture of medicine, with its central belief that in situations of high risk and complexity what you want is a kind of expert audacity — the right stuff, again.
I admire Vivienne Westwood greatly and there is no doubt that her work gave me the confidence to go in search of past traditions and look for a kind of modernity, audacity and creativity for tomorrow.
As he reaches for pop exposure, Lil Wayne is tempering braggadocio with a different kind of audacity: he's showing himself as more vulnerable than ever.
He said, "When we started this show, the hottest show on TV was 'Keeping Up with the Gabors.' " It seemed audacious to even make a Gabor joke in 2015, and I appreciate that kind of audacity.
But if forced to choose (and "you've written" is past tense, after all, not future) I might pick "Gone Tomorrow," which starts well and then continues with the kind of audacity that presses hard against the line without, I hope, ever quite falling over the edge.
There are not many footballers, never mind teenage centre-halves, with that kind of audacity and self-belief and, two years on, it is easy to see why David Moyes, the manager who signed him for £3m, always felt Stones was so elegant on the ball he could easily play in midfield.
With some audacity and style, Cianfrance offers us instead a kind of diptych: two panels showing two comparable men.
