Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a kind kind" is not correct and not usable in written English.
Instead, you could use phrases such as "very kind" or "incredibly kind". For example: "He was an incredibly kind person who always put others before himself".
Exact(1)
She hadn't been angry; she was a kind, kind woman, whose disappointment was far harder to bear than her anger.
Similar(59)
"It's a unique, one-of-a-kind kind of piece.
"This is, in many respects, a one-of-a-kind kind of lawsuit with one-of-a-kind kind of claims and a one-of-a-kind moment with the politics over drug law reform," said Douglas Berman, a professor at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law.
"She was a very energetic, very kind, kind soul," her former husband, Eric, a vineyard manager, who remained close with the woman, wrote on his Facebook page.
"You kind, kind creature".
To investigate whether our pigeons also showed a similar latency effect we compared the latencies to initiate the next trial following one-of-a-kind, two-of-a-kind, three-of-a-kind, and four-of-a-kind (winning) trials.
To compare the response latency to start a new trial after winning (four-of-a-kind) and losing (one-of-a-kind, two-of-a-kind, and three-of-a-kind) trials, a one-way ANOVA with repeated measures across Trial Type (one-of-a-kind vs. two-of-a-kind vs. three-of-a-kind vs. four-of-a-kind) was conducted.
One-of-a-kind, two-of-a-kind, and three-of-a-kind trials resulted in no reward and direct entry into the ITI.
Consistent with the human literature [32], we found that the latency following four-of-a-kind (winning) trials was longer than that following one-of-a-kind, two-of-a-kind, and three-of-a-kind trials, and that the latency following one-of-a-kind, two-of-a-kind, and three-of-a-kind trials was no different.
Post-hoc Scheffe tests (evaluated at p<.05) were then used to determine if the latency following four-of-a-kind (winning) trials was longer than that following one-of-a-kind, two-of-a-kind, and three-of-a-kind trials, and that the latency following one-of-a-kind, two-of-a-kind, and three-of-a-kind trials was no different.
The analysis was conducted with Trial Type (one-of-a-kind vs. two-of-a-kind vs. three-of-a-kind) and Stimulus (identical vs. nonidentical) as factors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com