The phrase "a justification for that" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to explain or provide reasons for a particular action, decision, or statement.
Example: "The committee requested a justification for that decision before moving forward with the project."
Alternatives: "a rationale for that" or "an explanation for that".
Notwithstanding the broad general trend toward centralized regulatory authority in environmental law, and the widespread invocation of transboundary pollution as a justification for that trend, little meaningful regulation of transboundary pollution actually exists.
by not later than five days after the date on which such a determination is made, submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence notice of that determination, including a justification for that determination.
by not later than five days after the date on which such a determination is made, the Secretary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence notice of that determination, including a justification for that determination.
A minor area representative (MAR) must be selected, and a justification for that selection must be provided in the box on the form.
"It may not have been their intention but their views have already been picked up by the far-right and their comments reflect a justification for that".
The extent to which that had happened by the end of the first millennium AD is illustrated by the fact that England had already worked out a justification for claiming that its kings were superior to all others in Britain.
Just as the right wing used Charles Murray's laissez-faire critique in "Losing Ground" as a justification for saying that welfare led to dependency and indolence, Clinton has looked for a rejoinder in the works of William Julius Wilson.
England had already worked out a justification for claiming that its kings were superior to all others in Britain.
Hence, if one cannot provide a justification for principles that others can accept given their reasonable beliefs then those principles are not justified for those persons.
Given your antecedent justification for believing Q, you are justified in trusting your own counting and so you acquire a justification for P that intuitively transmits to Q, thereby strengthening your antecedent testimony-based justification for it.
But in today's wars, where civilians have become the prime targets, there is rarely a justification for war that mitigates the suffering and loss of war.
