The phrase "a jurisprudential" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something related to jurisprudence, which is the theory or philosophy of law.
Example: "The court's decision was based on a jurisprudential analysis of the existing legal framework."
Alternatives: "a legal" or "a judicial".
Screws v. United States was a jurisprudential tease.
His first publication, in 1729, which has since been lost (or, one might suspect, intentionally purged), was a jurisprudential treatise, "On the Right of Moors in Europe".
But to portray Roe as the statesmanlike "settlement" of a divisive issue, a jurisprudential Peace of Westphalia that is worth preserving, is nothing less than Orwellian.
In a jurisprudential context, micro-states are not, properly speaking, countries at all: imperial devolution has simply vested former colonial entities with sovereign rights without regard to their ability to fulfil sovereign duties.
Following decisions on five individual cases the court followed up in June with general ruling, known as a jurisprudential thesis, stating that laws restricting marriage to heterosexual couples were discriminatory and unconstitutional.
Its reasoning seemed to augur a continued slide toward a jurisprudential bizarro world in which corporations are people, money is speech, and corruption is defined as outright bribery and little else.
"Today's opinion," Chief Justice Roberts wrote, "requires state and federal judges simultaneously to act as political scientists (why did candidate X win the election?), economists (was the financial support disproportionate?) and psychologists (is there likely to be a debt of gratitude?)." Justice Scalia, in a separate dissent, said Monday's decision illustrated a larger jurisprudential problem.
This is the sort of thing that leads the nation's constitutional scholars to cite a venerable jurisprudential doctrine: go figure.
If a guiding jurisprudential philosophy underlay his views, it involved, as Murphy concedes, "determining which issues were in his own best interests, battling with his enemies and taking positions with an eye to his political future".
Beyond the glib smokescreen of what Timothy Sandefur calls the "foolish, misguided, politically biased, intentionally misleading nonsense" written about substantive due process lies a serious jurisprudential concept that would have been perfectly familiar to the Framers of both the original Constitution and the Reconstruction Amendments -- and embraced by many of them.
Further, we identified the scarce existence of a clear jurisprudential doctrine, due either to the lack of capacity in superior bodies or to the shortage of demands presented in front of the courts.
