The phrase "a judicial act" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to an action or decision made by a judge or court in the course of legal proceedings.
Example: "The judge's ruling was deemed a judicial act that set a precedent for future cases."
Alternatives: "a court decision" or "a legal action".
It was a political, not a judicial act, a travesty from start to finish.
It is not because of the maxim, "No one may be the judge in his own case," because a pardon is an executive action, not a judicial act.
In these denominations, absolution is neither a judicial act nor a means by which the forgiveness of sins is conferred but is, instead, a statement of divine judgment and divine forgiveness.
Are you saying here that their interpretation was so far unreasonable in defining legal vote as not to be a judicial act entitled, in effect, to the presumption of reasonable interpretation under Article II? MR. OLSON.
"A court order directing a local government body to levy its own taxes is plainly a judicial act within the power of a Federal court," Justice White said, adding that there was an important difference between a judge's direct imposition of a tax increase and an order to local officials to increase the tax themselves.
The indictment is therefore a political and not a judicial act; in fact it is a gross abuse of the judiciary and prosecutorial power for political purposes.
Bush does not, of course, claim that any judicial act interpreting a statute of uncertain meaning is enough to displace the legislative provision and violate Article II; statutes require interpretation, which does not without more affect the legislative character of a statute within the meaning of the Constitution.
It is a solemn judicial act that sets the course of the law for hundreds or thousands of litigants and potential litigants.
What is it in the contest provision that supports the theory that that was a rogue, illegal judicial act?
See, e.g., Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976) (state prosecutors possess absolute immunity with respect to the initiation and pursuit of prosecutions); Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) (state judge possesses absolute immunity for all judicial acts).
"It is a serious political and judicial act that has shocked even me," Mr. Josipovic said of the verdicts.
