The phrase "a judgment in which" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific type of decision or ruling made by a court or authority, often to introduce the context of the judgment.
Example: "The case presented a judgment in which the defendant was found guilty of all charges."
Alternatives: "a ruling that" or "a decision in which".
We learn en route that his mother calls him a narcissist, a judgment in which he seems to take pride.
The following day the court of appeal handed down a judgment in which it said LIFG associates could not be deported to Libya as they could be tortured, regardless of any assurances offered by Gaddafi.
It was, after all, a judgment in which the NoTW had been found to be guilty not only of practices tantamount to blackmail, but also of casual and cavalier journalism.
290, "It is not contrary to natural justice that a man who has agreed to receive a particular mode of notification of legal proceedings should be bound by a judgment in which that particular mode of notification has been followed, even though he may not have actual notice of them". See also The Lafayette Insurance Co. v. French et al., 18 How.
Such a judgment, in Kant's critical terminology, must now be synthetic it is a judgment in which "the connection of the predicate with the subject … is thought without identity," where "a predicate is added to the concept of the subject which is by no means thought in it, and which could not have been extracted from it by any analysis" (A7/B10 11).
To address this theoretical risk, in 1974 the German and Italian constitutional courts each adopted a judgment in which they asserted their power to review European law in order to ensure its consistency with constitutional rights (Solange I; Frontini).
It may be tempting to think that we can simply re-define 'aesthetic judgment' such that it refers to any judgment in which an aesthetic property is predicated of an object.
The most important was a judgment, in 1993, which held that execution cannot take place more than five years after sentencing.
To test for blur after-effects, we instead used a relative judgment in which observers adapted to both a blurred and sharpened image in two separate fields and then compared the relative appearance of a pair of test images shown within the same fields.
During the interval between death and resurrection, there is a preliminary judgment in which the dead have their deeds weighed in a balance.
One possible remedy in this case might be a new judgment in which Tesla's in-house lawyers review all of Mr. Musk's tweets in advance.
