Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a increasing function of" is not correct; it should be "an increasing function of." You can use it in mathematical or analytical contexts when describing a function that rises as its input increases.
Example: "The variable y is an increasing function of x, meaning that as x increases, y also increases."
Alternatives: "a rising function of" or "a function that increases with".
Exact(3)
The plot of the normalized phase velocity corresponding to f = 2.34 GHz as a function of beam energy is illustrated in the Fig. 14. Figure 14 shows that, the phase velocity is a increasing function of the beam energy and remains constant after γ > 1.05.
Note that, the effect of PM depends on its level m, 0 ≤ m ≤ M, and its relationship with the remaining life is characterized by the age-incremental factor δ(m). Larger value of m represents greater PM effort, hence δ(m) is a increasing function of m with δ(0) = 0 and δ(M) = 1.
In other words, the semi-permeability hypothesis imposes that the average number of ferritin molecules N (t) is a increasing function of time t.
Similar(57)
namely the expression of r is an increasing function of HI A and Theorem 1 is demonstrated.
The sheet charge density ns is a parameter which is an increasing function of the excitation power.
Therefore, the fitness function can be represented as an increasing function of a protein alignment score.
A measure evaluating the discriminative power of a region should be defined as an increasing function of the discriminative power.
Therefore, (G t,qs)) is an increasing function of t for a fixed (sin[0,1]).
(1) is an increasing function of (2) is a continuous, twice differentiable sigmoidal function with respect to.
Furthermore, it is observed that while SSE is an increasing function of SNR, SEE is a decreasing function of SNR.
As a result, the average rate is not necessarily an increasing function of K.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com