The phrase "a hypothesis for which" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when introducing a hypothesis that is being discussed or analyzed in a specific context.
Example: "The researchers proposed a hypothesis for which they gathered extensive data to support their claims."
Alternatives: "a hypothesis that" or "a hypothesis regarding".
Ebrard, like many others, thinks that the Mexican-American vote, and the Latino vote generally, was a sleeping giant that has been awakened, a hypothesis for which there may be evidence in early returns from Nevada.
If inferentialism is true, then when I see, e.g., a dog bounding around in front of me with a toy in its mouth, wagging its tail and looking at me, then I may consider the possibility that the dog wants my attention, that it is feeling happy and playful — but this is only a hypothesis, for which I must provide a solid argument from justified premises if I am to justifiably believe it.
Classical Darwinists echo French mathematician Pierre Laplace, who is reputed to have said to Napoleon that God is a hypothesis for which there is no longer any need.
Finally, there's the grim possibility that the small hits matter as much as the big ones -- a hypothesis for which there is growing evidence.
It is also present in the amphioxus, but since it is absent from other Deuterostomes, it is not clear whether it is an ancestral position or represents a case of parallel insertion, unless one considers intron 4 (vertebrates) as the result of a 5 bp-sliding from position 5, a hypothesis for which there is no evidence.
Another factor obviously is the assumption (inherent to intermolecular correlated mutation analysis) that orthologs will have similar interaction partners, a hypothesis for which evidence exists [ 55] but that also has been challenged [ 56].
In particular, we employ a Wald test with a null hypothesis for which the speed of adjustment above τ is equal to the speed of adjustment below τ.
This is a plausible hypothesis for which there is precedent [67].
One answer to this is that it is an empirical hypothesis for which there is little real evidence.
In category one belong all hypotheses for which it is relatively easy to find a meaningful biological interpretation.
The classic Benjamini Hochberg method rejects all hypotheses for which the corresponding P-values are in the set { p(1), p(2),…, p(v )}.
