Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a holds for" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete expression and lacks clarity without additional context.
Example: "The theorem states that a holds for all values of x greater than zero."
Alternatives: "is valid for" or "applies to".
Exact(12)
Zhou et al. [2] left an open problem whether the case (alpha =gamma) of Theorem A holds for ρ̃-mixing random variables.
A set (Asubseteq mathbb{R}^{n}) is called m-invex with respect to the mapping (eta :A times Atimes (0, 1]rightarrow mathbb{R}^{n}) for some fixed (min (0, 1]) if (mx+lambda eta (y, x, m) in A) holds for all (x, y in A) and (lambda in [0, 1]).
Therefore (a) holds for any.
Assumption (A) holds for a wide class of (not necessarily closed) sets including these classical models.
Setting (G_{n} :=D_{n} cap G), we see that (G_{n}) is open and (Ssubset G_{n}subset G), that is, (a) holds for each (G_{n}).
As cent su ( k ) [ cent su ( k ) ( cent su ( k ) ( A ) ) ] = cent su ( k ) ( A ) holds for any set A, which can also be inferred from [[72], Proposition 6.1.3.1 iii)], we obtain cent su ( k ) ( cent su ( k ) ( g ) ) = g.
Similar(48)
For example, in intuitionism every natural number has a prime factorization; there exist computably enumerable sets that are not computable; $(A \vee \neg A)$ holds for all quantifier free statements $A$.
We say that a property holds for △-a.e.
A similar process holds for cognition.
A similar story holds for other commodities.
A similar inequality holds for.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com