Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The phrase "a history without" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to discuss the absence of certain events, influences, or perspectives in a historical context.
Example: "The book explores a history without the contributions of women, highlighting the gaps in traditional narratives."
Alternatives: "a narrative lacking" or "a past devoid of".
Exact(14)
It is a history without a soul".
But "Inhuman Bondage" is not a history without people.
It might well have seemed that he had had "a history without a life".
"A history without chronology is no history at all," Mr. Song wrote in a newspaper article this fall.
And yet, it's important to write of an "event", a "story" or a "history" without taking on board the way that it's written.
In the course of his current term, Putin has commissioned and personally overseen an effort aimed at producing schoolbooks that present a history "without internal contradictions or dual interpretations".
Similar(46)
It would mean that French Canada, a people "without a history and without a literature," would gradually assimilate into the larger, English-speaking continent.
"But she was a history maker, without a doubt.
Proportionally, more patients with a history than without a history of CHF have reported this as an adverse event (7% vs. 0.3%).
Any resulting prediction or explanation (retrodiction) of individual behavior is an approximation to a 'world history without names'.
Is there a way to retell a violent history without resorting to the sensationalism of 'narcoliterature'narcoliterature
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com