a higher cost effectiveness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a higher cost effectiveness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the efficiency of a product or service in relation to its cost, indicating that it provides better value for money compared to alternatives. Example: "Our new product offers a higher cost effectiveness, making it a more attractive option for budget-conscious consumers."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

A higher cost effectiveness threshold has been debated for products with high social value [ 30].

BMC Ophthalmology

Studies conducted in semi-immune populations have shown a higher cost effectiveness of RDTs in children <5 years compared to other age groups [ 14, 29].

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Additionally, results of this analysis showed a high cost effectiveness and cost utility for the CONTOUR® TS system relative to manually coded blood glucose meters.

Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy

15 35 The intuition behind this result is that a strategy that will break the transmission chain with the minimum of effort will simultaneously minimise the number of infections, deaths, life years lost, or peak healthcare demand and will achieve a high cost effectiveness of infection control.

British Medical Journal

34 It is recommended that countries with a high risk of cervical cancer or a high cost effectiveness threshold screen more intensively (that is, begin screening at a younger age, end at an older age, and have a shorter interval between the scheduled examinations) than countries with a low risk or a low cost effectiveness threshold, ranging from three to 20 examinations during a lifetime.

British Medical Journal

In that quadrant, a higher cost-effectiveness threshold reduces the probability of being cost-effective.

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research

Thus, from the economic point of view, it seems rational to allocate health care budgets towards diseases that are curable, have a higher cost-effectiveness and cater for the majority of the population.

Health Economics Review

In addition, the proper selection of number and location of hubs may achieve a higher cost-effectiveness as well as an increase in service territory at no additional operating cost.

International Journal of Production Economics

The advantages of geosynthetic-reinforcing technology to construct new soil structures including; (a) a relatively short construction period; (b) small construction machines necessary; and (c) a higher stability of completed structures, all contributing to a higher cost-effectiveness, are addressed.

Geotextiles and Geomembranes

A higher cost-effectiveness ratio does not imply that additional lives are not worth saving.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

The IMSS is predicted to pay more for a second-line therapy if it demonstrates a higher cost-effectiveness ratio than comparators.

British Journal of Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing different strategies or products, use "a higher cost effectiveness" to clearly indicate which option provides better value for the resources invested.

Common error

Avoid stating that a solution has "a higher cost effectiveness" without providing specific data or comparisons. Always substantiate claims with evidence or analysis to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

Noun phrase. The phrase "a higher cost effectiveness" functions as a noun phrase typically used as a subject or object within a sentence. It signifies a quality or attribute of a product, service, or strategy, indicating its economic value relative to its cost. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is both correct and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

90%

Formal & Business

5%

News & Media

3%

Less common in

Reference

1%

Wiki

0.5%

Encyclopedias

0.5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a higher cost effectiveness" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, especially in scientific and formal contexts. As Ludwig AI highlighted, it's about obtaining better value for the invested resources. While stating this, be sure to back it up with evidence for full credibility. If you need a synonym, you could use "greater economic efficiency" or "improved value for money". This phrase is not only about low costs but also how the value generated outweighs these costs.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

greater economic efficiency

Focuses on the economic aspect of efficiency, emphasizing better resource utilization.

improved value for money

Highlights the enhanced value received in relation to the expenditure.

better resource allocation

Emphasizes the optimized distribution of resources for maximum benefit.

enhanced cost benefit

Stresses the improvement in the relationship between costs and benefits.

superior efficiency in expenditure

Highlights the efficiency aspect of expenditure, emphasizing a better use of funds.

increased return on investment

Concentrates on the financial returns gained from an investment.

more efficient use of funds

Focuses on the efficiency aspect of expenditure, emphasizing a better use of funds.

optimized spending efficiency

Highlights the optimization of spending, ensuring minimal waste.

better economic returns

Focuses on the economic aspect of returns, emphasizing better financial gains.

enhanced financial performance

Stresses the improvement in the financial performance of an investment or project.

FAQs

How can I demonstrate "a higher cost effectiveness" in a proposal?

Clearly outline the costs and benefits of your proposed solution, and then compare it to alternatives. Use metrics like return on investment or cost-benefit ratio to support your claim.

What are some alternatives to saying "a higher cost effectiveness"?

You can use alternatives like "greater economic efficiency", "improved value for money", or "better resource allocation" depending on the context.

Which is more impactful: "a higher cost" or "a higher cost effectiveness"?

"A higher cost" simply indicates an increased expense. "A higher cost effectiveness" implies a better value for the money spent, meaning the benefits outweigh the expenses, even if the initial cost is higher.

In what situations is "a higher cost effectiveness" most relevant?

This phrase is particularly relevant in fields like healthcare, engineering, and business, where resources are limited and decisions require careful consideration of both expenses and outcomes.