The phrase "a high-level discussion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a conversation or dialogue that focuses on broad concepts or overarching themes rather than specific details.
Example: "During the meeting, we engaged in a high-level discussion about the future direction of the company."
Alternatives: "an overarching discussion" or "a strategic conversation".
Musk said he and Carter had a "high-level" discussion not about procurement programs but about innovation.
But the Congress has offered only a high-level discussion with Inkatha, apparently reluctant to confer upon Chief Buthlezi a status equal to that of Mr. Mandela.
Though the label suggests a high-level discussion of international affairs — even if through the prism of each member's global investments — the discussion, at least on the day I visited, focused mainly on each member's travels since the last meeting.
Third, we explore defenses against attacks with both a high-level discussion of defenses within our taxonomy and a multi-level defense against attacks in the domain of virus detection.
As the signs of civic and moral depreciation in our nation increase, it may be the right time for presidential candidates to engage in a high-level discussion of the formative ideas that shaped our public philosophy and the distinctive character of our nation.
So extra judicial kidnapping becomes 'rendition', torture becomes 'enhanced interrogation', detainees are held on information that barely qualifies as hearsay, and assassination becomes 'targeted killing'". Leonard told a high-level discussion group on secrecy and security convened by the Brennan Center for Justice in Washington that even language had suffered in this scramble for new powers.
To this day, there has not been any high-level discussion among lawmakers about the threat of insurrectionist violence.
The conference offered a high level discussion on this topic with some of the internationally most renowned experts of intellectual property rights.
While Jacobson et al. provided a high level discussion about the economics of a wind, water, and solar energy system, they did not provide enough detail on the methods and data they used to provide a convincing argument that the transition will not be extremely costly.
If the discussion drifts towards answers to specific questions asked on an assignment, then it is no longer a high level discussion and you should push the discussion in another direction.
