a high quality of

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence 'a high quality of' is not correct and does not make sense.
This phrase should be phrased as 'a high quality' or 'high quality of'. For example, "He produces a high quality of work consistently."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

By all measures, it has a high quality of life.

The Washington Post

It gives you a high quality of life.

The New York Times

We have to maintain a high quality of health care.

The Economist

The results indicate a high quality of the predicted ephemerides.

Advances in Space Research

However, the procedure needs a high quality of skill.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

At the moment I claim DLA, allowing me to maintain a high quality of life.

The Guardian - Opinion

Many people continue to live with a high quality of life well into their later years.

The New York Times

People want to live in cities where there's a high quality of life.

The Guardian

How can we ensure that we will enjoy a high quality of life as we age?

The Guardian - Opinion

At the end of the process, you'll receive a high quality of candidates recommended for interview.

The Guardian

Another factor was a high quality of performance in more than one game.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to the quality of something, consider using the adjective "high-quality" directly before the noun it modifies, rather than the phrase "a high quality of". For example, use "high-quality service" instead of "a high quality of service."

Common error

Avoid using "a high quality of" when you intend to describe something as simply high-quality. Often, the 'of' is unnecessary and grammatically awkward. Opt for "high-quality" as a direct adjective or rephrase to use "high quality" as a noun.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a high quality of" functions primarily as a modifier, often intended to describe a characteristic or attribute of something. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered grammatically incorrect. While appearing in various contexts, it is frequently replaceable with more grammatically sound alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

48%

Academia

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a high quality of" is frequently used across various domains, including news, science, and academia. However, Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically incorrect and should be replaced with alternatives such as "high-quality" or rephrasing to "high quality". While its intent is to emphasize superior characteristics, adopting more grammatically sound phrasing is recommended for improved clarity and accuracy. A variety of sources such as Forbes and The New York Times are identified by Ludwig, highlighting its widespread yet potentially incorrect use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

high-quality

This alternative is a more concise adjective form, directly describing something as having high quality.

superior quality

This emphasizes a level of quality that is above average or standard.

excellent quality

This uses a different adjective to convey the high standard of quality.

first-rate quality

This suggests that the quality is among the best, indicating top-tier standards.

premium quality

This implies that the quality is exceptional, often associated with luxury or high value.

top-notch quality

This is an informal way to express that the quality is outstanding and of the highest level.

high degree of quality

This alternative uses 'degree' to specify the extent of quality, offering a more formal tone.

refined quality

This suggests the quality has been improved or perfected over time.

exceptional caliber

This alternative emphasizes the high standard and competence of the quality.

unmatched quality

This alternative suggests that the quality is unparalleled and superior to others.

FAQs

How can I use "a high quality of" correctly?

While commonly used, "a high quality of" is often grammatically awkward. It's generally better to use "high-quality" as an adjective before a noun (e.g., "high-quality service") or rephrase to use "high quality" as a noun (e.g., "the high quality of the work").

What's a more concise way to say "a high quality of"?

Consider using the single-word adjective "high-quality". It's more direct and often improves sentence flow.

Is "a high quality of" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "a high quality of" is considered incorrect. While prevalent, it's often better to rephrase for grammatical accuracy. Ludwig identifies usage in various sources, but it's important to note its assessment of the phrase's correctness.

When should I use "high quality" versus "high-quality"?

"High quality" (two words) functions as a noun. For instance, you might speak of "the high quality of the product". "High-quality" (hyphenated) functions as an adjective modifying a noun: "a high-quality product".