Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a high probability of developing breast" is not correct as it is incomplete and lacks clarity.
It could be used in a medical or health-related context, but it needs to specify what is being developed, such as "a high probability of developing breast cancer."
Example: "The study found that women with a family history have a high probability of developing breast cancer."
Alternatives: "a strong likelihood of developing breast" or "a significant chance of developing breast."
Exact(2)
Myriad is best known for a genetic test that can indicate a high probability of developing breast cancer, though it also has tests for colon cancer, melanoma and hypertension.
Germline mutations in the BRCA-1 gene confer a high probability of developing breast (~65 %) and ovarian (~40 %) tumors [ 1– 6].
Similar(58)
But what happens, Gazzaniga asks, when we identify genes that indicate a high probability of developing diabetes or heart disease in middle age?
There are things that are under contract that we're developing, there are things that have a high probability of developing.
Patients with a HAIR score ≥ 2 are considered to have a high probability of developing non alcoholic steatohepatitis.
People carrying one dysfunctional p53 gene in their germline have a high probability of developing a tumor.
Children without access to health care are assumed to go untreated and face a higher probability of developing severe illness.
The downregulation of miR-646 also indicated a higher probability of developing metastasis.
Mexico City boys had a higher probability of developing interstitial markings with age (p = 0.004).
Some people have a higher chance of developing breast cancer than others.
Women with a clinically significant mutation in one of those genes have a 35 to 84percentt probability of developing breast cancer by age 70 and a 10 to 50percentt probability of developing ovarian cancer, far higher than for women in general.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com