The phrase "a high level of objective" is not correct in English.
It seems to be a mix-up of terms; "high level" typically describes quality or intensity, while "objective" is a noun that refers to a goal or aim.
Example: "The project requires a high level of clarity in its objectives to ensure success."
Alternatives: "a high standard of goals" or "a significant degree of aim."
Gica (2012) surveyed 200 SEs in northwestern Romania and found the external analysis component of the overall planning indicator to be positively correlated with a higher level of objective achievement with a confidence level of 99%.
Findings from quantitative strand showed that Chinese caregivers experienced a higher level of objective burden evidenced by significantly longer hours per day on care activities than their Australian counterparts (19.5 versus 14.2 respectively, p = 0.003, please see Table 1).
At baseline, a higher level of objective competence was demonstrated within the intervention group (mean = 28.34) than within the control group (mean = 26.36) although this difference was not statistically significant; two sample t(28) = 0.66, p = 0.520.
By comparing the two cultural cohorts in a cross-national context, this study captured the divergence between the objective and subjective caregiver burdens: a higher level of subjective burden with a lower level of objective burden in the Australian cohort versus a lower level of subjective burden with a higher level of objective burden in the Chinese cohort.
Despite its simplicity, SRH has been shown to display a high level of correlation with objective health measures such as mortality, morbidity and health control strategies [ 37].
Training activities by firms are a factor contributing to a high level of employment (an objective under Article 2 of the Treaty).
Objective: A high level of plasma homocysteine may be deleterious to vascular health.
Enhancing the role of 'frontline' clinical staff, defining pathways of care and promoting integration between major centres and rural clinicians entail a high level of support from clinical staff for objective implementation and evaluation.
Non-systematic error is possible – for instance this might have come about through poor reliability of the interviewing team or through participants' errors in recall of their health problems, although previous work has shown a high level of agreement between self-report and objective health status measures [ 19].
