The phrase "a high level of coherence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the clarity, consistency, or logical flow of ideas in a text, argument, or presentation.
Example: "The research paper demonstrated a high level of coherence, making it easy for readers to follow the author's argument."
Alternatives: "a strong degree of coherence" or "a significant level of coherence".
During the El Niño events, the February to May, November (0) to April, and November (0) to May wet period for UR, MR, and LR respectively, are the signal seasons having a high level of coherence and consistency.
According to the ΔF record constructed for the 2015 definitive data, the processed data from the magnetometers have a high level of coherence, as the ΔF amplitude does not exceed 1 nT during the whole year.
The experiment with actual users, although preliminary, has shown that CAM can provide relevant suggestions and offer potentially useful guidance for writing abstracts with a high level of coherence.
Analysis of summary rankings indicates a high level of coherence between current and desired policies in all domains: coefficients of determination (R) vary from 0.46 for Health System Structure (with a high correlation coefficient; r = 0.68, P <0.01) to 0.86 for Sustainable Financing (r = 0.93, P <0.01) – current policies, overall, would cover adequate topics.
We also resorted to actual users to evaluate our coherence analysis module, which has been incorporated into the SciPo system, and results demonstrate its potential to help users write scientific abstracts with a higher level of coherence.
Synthesis necessarily involves "assessment" itself and informed judgment, as well as a high level of integration and coherence.
Three core regions, namely the Upper Region (UR), the Middle Region (MR), and the Lower Region (LR), were identified with a high level of the spatial coherence and temporal consistency rate, which represent the geographical extent and magnitude of the response of the ENSO forcing to the precipitation patterns.
There was high level of coherence between current and desired policies: coefficients of determination (R) varied from 0.46 (Health system structure; r = 0.68, P <0.01) to 0.86 (Sustainable financing; r = 0.93, P <0.01).
This innovative method not only highlighted the high level of coherence between the empirical and theoretical structure (Table 6), it also resulted in a shift in emphasis towards factor labels that reflect the potential impact of glaucoma on Activities and Participation (which are key constructs within the ICF model).
