The phrase "a hemodynamic monitoring system" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in medical or clinical contexts when discussing systems that measure and analyze the blood flow and pressure in the body.
Example: "The hospital recently upgraded to a new hemodynamic monitoring system to improve patient care in the intensive care unit."
Alternatives: "a cardiovascular monitoring system" or "a blood flow monitoring system".
Eventually, the question remains as to how a hemodynamic monitoring system should be evaluated.
Of course, the final choice of a hemodynamic monitoring system is patient and pathology dependent.
However, can we reasonably expect a hemodynamic monitoring system to improve patient outcome in the critical care setting?
The last two decades have seen an explosion in the numbers of manuscripts published aiming at evaluating the accuracy of a hemodynamic monitoring system to measure CO accurately.
The ultimate goal of any hemodynamic monitoring system is to provide the clinicians with additional information on the underlying pathological condition and to guide fluid or vasopressor therapy.
However, this system is not a monitoring system per se and does not substitute for a continuous hemodynamic monitoring system.
Before the induction of anesthesia, a complete hemodynamic monitoring system was set up in the operating room.
For institutions who cannot afford a proprietary hemodynamic monitoring system for their patients, fluid optimization can be achieved effectively by monitoring respiratory variations in the arterial pressure or in the plethysmographic waveform depending on the clinical context.
Today, technological platforms allowing for a continuum of care from a totally non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring system to a mini-invasive one and then to an invasive one (or vice versa) are just emerging.
This is a minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring system based on mathematical analysis of the invasive arterial waveform recorded at a high sampling rate (1,000 Hz).
The signal was then directed via the analogic output to a MostCare® pulse contour hemodynamic monitoring system (Vygon, Vytech Health, Padova, Italy) in order to measure the dP/dtMAX.
