The phrase "a grouped analysis" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an analysis that is organized or categorized into groups for better understanding or comparison.
Example: "The report includes a grouped analysis of the survey results, highlighting the differences between various demographic segments."
Alternatives: "a categorized analysis" or "a collective analysis".
In a grouped analysis of three studies versus citalopram, the superior efficacy of escitalopram also increased in parallel with the initial severity.
A grouped analysis of two similarly designed studies showed that the difference in favour of escitalopram increased at the same time as the initial severity increased.
A grouped analysis was performed to compare the patterns of copy number aberrations in the pre-treatment samples with those in the post-treatment samples.
However, this is a grouped analysis and therefore cannot be adjusted for confounding co-variates, such as age/sex and study as in models II and III.
This analysis was performed, firstly, to search for genes whose expression was regulated irrespective of body weight, comparing the NC group with the L, M and H mice considered as a unique HFD group ("Grouped analysis").
This is a drawback of "grouped" analysis, which suppresses individual characteristics.
The second level, designated here as "grouped analysis", corresponds to grouping libraries that were from the same tissue and state (normal or cancerous).
Xerosis is not included in this grouped analysis as xerosis as a skin sign (meaning clinically dry skin in the absence of scaling) is not independently associated with FLG null mutations.
The only result that was formally statistically significant was a higher coefficient for the highest category of B[ a]P exposure in the grouped analysis (Table 3) but the absence of any evidence of a trend allows also the alternative possibility this may simply be a chance finding.
Grouped analysis of CSF Aβ levels from multiple industry and academic groups collected by either lumbar puncture (n=83) or indwelling lumbar catheter (n=178).
The grouped analysis revealed one statistically significant comparison between barefoot trials for the root mean square greater than 60 Hz variable.
