The phrase "a group of pathologists" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a collective of medical professionals who specialize in pathology, often in contexts related to medical research, diagnosis, or healthcare.
Example: "The conference featured a group of pathologists discussing the latest advancements in cancer research."
Alternatives: "a team of pathologists" or "a panel of pathologists".
We found that the records came from a billing agency used by a group of pathologists who did work for the hospital".
We investigated whether a group of pathologists could reproducibly apply the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) classification for lung adenocarcinoma to a cohort of stage 1 tumors and whether this architectural classification and/or other parameters could demonstrate survival advantage.
Photographed results of panels of 10 samples assayed in four HIV RDTs were used to assess and compare the proficiency of interpretation by three groups of operators (non-laboratory trained personnel, laboratory trained operators and a group of pathologists attending a national meeting).
Recent reports comparing a group of pathologists and industrial workers, and using individual devices to monitor exposure to formaldehyde demonstrated that environmental exposure in pathology departments is trivial in most areas while the sampling activity in the gross room may result in exposure to toxic levels that exceed the recommended values [ 15, 16].
Robert Cardiff (University of California at Davis, California, USA) also ran a pathology tutorial that discussed the consensus terminology and recommendations of a group of pathologists from a National Cancer Institute sponsored workshop held in Annaopolis, Maryland, USA in March 1999, entitled 'Comparative Pathology of Animal Models for Mammary Cancer'.
Dr. Sperry said he requested the activation of the Federal Disaster Mortuary Team, a group of forensic pathologists, anthropologists and medical examiners who are usually summoned when a natural disaster destroys a cemetery.
Since 1976, a group of European pathologists described a subtype of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) that was characterized by megakaryocytic and granulocytic proliferation, with atypical megakaryocyte morphology, but without any significant bone marrow fibrosis1,2.
Scoring was carried out in a standardized way by a group of dedicated pathologists in routine surgical pathology.
To provide a quantitative assessment of the morphological features, tumour sections from each case were studied by a group of eight pathologists each of whom scored a series of features using an agreed protocol.
This also applies to the fourth edition; a group of 25 pathologists and geneticists convened at the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg in November 2006 and the results of their deliberations and those of an additional 50 contributors are contained in the 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system [ 35].
The explanation for this perceived heterogeneity was probably revealed by a recent study in which bone marrow biopsy samples and aspirates from 54 patients with CAD were systematically reexamined by a group of lymphoma pathologists, using a standardized panel of morphological, immunohistochemical, flow cytometric, and molecular methods [ 44].
