The phrase "a group of equal" is not complete and lacks context, making it difficult to assess its correctness in written English.
It could be used in contexts discussing equality among members of a group, but it typically requires additional information to clarify its meaning.
Example: "In a democratic society, a group of equal participants is essential for fair decision-making."
Alternatives: "a team of equals" or "a collective of equals".
However, a database doesn't make it easy for a group of equal counterparties to maintain, and perform, transactions across a single store of verifiable data that no single one of them controls.
This illustrates the passage in the above quotation which says "The scope of the bracket indicated by any collection of dots extends backwards or forwards beyond any smaller number of dots, or any equal number from a group of less force, until we reach either the end of the asserted proposition or a greater number of dots or an equal number belonging to a group of equal or superior force".
Because excellent results in Cooper's test were uncommon (<4%), the two highest levels, good and excellent, were combined to obtain a group of equal size for comparison.
Because excellent results in the Cooper's test were uncommon (< 4%), the two highest levels, good and excellent, were combined to obtain a group of equal size for comparison between different fitness categories.
Because excellent results in the 12-min running test were uncommon (<4%), the two highest levels, good and excellent, were combined to obtain a group of equal size for comparison.
They operate as a group of equals.
And the smaller three-person team was explicitly designed as a group of equals with no single member in charge.
Powerful individuals performed worse in a group of equals than when they were collaborating with people less powerful than them, according to research from the Hass School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.
As Ardrey puts it, "A society is a group of un equal beings organized to meet common needs". And so long as we fail to recognize the fact, fail to embrace our evolutionary origins, we will continue on the road to catastrophe we are now traveling.
The score is the probability that a group of genes equal to or greater than the number in a network could be achieved by chance alone.
Hobsbawm, Granta's last editor before the war, confirms that Searle was one of a group of editorial equals.
