The phrase "a good fairness" is not commonly used in written English and may sound awkward.
It could be used in contexts discussing the quality of fairness in a specific situation, but it is not a standard expression.
Example: "In our discussions, we strive to achieve a good fairness in all decisions made."
Alternatives: "a fair approach" or "a just outcome."
Considering the demand satisfaction factor (DSF), the proposed algorithm can also achieve a good fairness performance.
To this end, a good fairness index may coincide with poor spectrum utilisation.
Typically, systems with JFI larger than 0.5 are considered to provide a good fairness of the resource distribution.
A comparison of throughput fairness shows that the algorithms have Jain's fairness index larger than 0.8, meaning that algorithms provide a good fairness of network resources.
Greening 1, i.e., proportionally decreasing all users' transmit powers, generally leads to a good fairness behavior, which is much better than Greening 2, i.e., proportionally decreasing the data rates for all modems.
The application of the proposed approach takes place in a slotted dual bus optical ring network (SDBORN), where we prove that a good fairness and high bandwidth efficiency are achieved, and that only two QoS classes (real-time and non-real-time classes) at the access interface (IP domain) are sufficient in order to fulfill the strict delay requirements of real-time data traffic.
Both Greening 1 and 3 have a very good fairness performance, but this comes with a price of greening, i.e., a decrease in normalized weighted data rate sum performance of 4 and 4.5%, respectively.
The tree with h = 1 has a very good fairness performance since it consists of only four nodes.
There are good fairness reasons to argue that a life year in the past, present, or future should have the same value, but there is no agreement about the role of discounting [ 40].
While for an offered traffic of 3 Mbit/s all schemes achieve similar good fairness values, for high traffic density (10 Mbit/s), the 802.11 protocol cannot even treat 60% of the users fair.
Besides, it responds quickly to the sudden variations of the offered load and achieves good fairness.
