Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a gold for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a gold for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a reward or prize, but it lacks proper context and structure. Example: "He received a gold for his outstanding performance in the competition." (This would need to be rephrased for clarity.)
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Science
Alternative expressions(7)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
28 human-written examples
In my mind, this is effectively a gold for Australia.
News & Media
We certainly could win a gold for self-loathing whinging.
News & Media
But if there were a gold for being a crowd, it would go to this crowd.
News & Media
Also Gemma Cairney, who won a Gold for her Radio 1 documentary on teacher-pupil affairs.
News & Media
"I have to think about winning a gold for the sponsors," he said.
News & Media
He wins a gold for abstract nouns, but there is truth in them.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
30 human-written examples
Grids were floated on drops of 1% BSA for 10 min to block for unspecific labeling, transferred to 5 µl drops of primary antibody and incubated for 30 min. The grids were then washed in 4 drops of PBS for a total of 15 min, transferred to 5 µl drops of Protein-A gold for 20 min, washed in 4 drops of PBS for 15 min and 6 drops of double distilled water.
Science
We examined the uptake of the monoclonal anti-uPAR Aantibody (R3) in HEK293-uPAR cells and used 10 nm protein A-gold for detection.
Science
This observation was confirmed by immuno-electron microscopy using a monoclonal antibody to human uPAR (R3) and 10 nm protein A-gold for detection, which identified uPAR in both early and late endosomal structures loaded with 5 nm BSA-gold for 2 hours at 37°C as endocytic tracer (Fig. 1, right).
Science
The grids were incubated with primary antibody against HSP70 (1∶10; anti-rabbit) and 10 nm protein A-gold for 30 min. To try to fix the gold labeling, 2% glutaraldehyde was used for 5 min followed by washing with double distilled water for 10 min. The grids were stained/embedded with a mixture of methylcellulose and uranyl acetate and analyzed by transmission EM.
Science
The committee pays $25,000 for a gold, $15,000 for a silver and $10,000 for a bronze.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When referring to a specific award, especially in sports or competitions, use the complete phrase "a gold medal for" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.
Common error
Avoid using "a gold for" on its own; it's grammatically incomplete. Always specify what the gold represents, such as "a gold medal" or "a gold award".
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a gold for" functions as an incomplete noun phrase. It aims to denote an award or recognition but lacks the necessary specification (e.g., medal, award) to be grammatically sound. Ludwig AI confirms this with its analysis.
Frequent in
News & Media
69%
Encyclopedias
13%
Science
8%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Formal & Business
3%
Social Media
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "a gold for" is frequently encountered across various sources, particularly in News & Media. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. To ensure clarity and correctness, it's best practice to specify what the "gold" represents by using phrases like ""a gold medal for"" or "a gold award for". While the phrase appears in many contexts, its usage should be approached with caution to avoid grammatical errors.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a gold medal for
Adds "medal" to clarify the type of award, improving grammatical correctness.
an award for
Replaces "gold" with a more general term for recognition.
a prize for
Substitutes "gold" with a broader term for a reward.
recognition for
Focuses on the act of being recognized rather than a specific award.
a reward for
Uses "reward" as a general substitute for "gold."
an honor for
Replaces the tangible award with the concept of honor or distinction.
a commendation for
Offers a more formal synonym for recognition or praise.
credit for
Shifts the focus to acknowledging contribution or accomplishment.
accolades for
Uses a more sophisticated term for praise and awards.
a distinction for
Replaces "gold" with a term emphasizing special achievement.
FAQs
How to use "a gold medal for" in a sentence?
Use "a gold medal for" to specify the reward given for winning a competition. For example: "She received "a gold medal for" her outstanding performance".
Is it correct to say "a gold for"?
No, "a gold for" is grammatically incorrect. You should specify what the "gold" refers to, such as "a gold medal for" or "a gold award for".
What can I say instead of "a gold for"?
You can use alternatives like "an award for", "a prize for", or "recognition for" depending on the context.
What's the difference between "a gold for" and "a gold medal for"?
"A gold for" is an incomplete phrase and grammatically incorrect, while ""a gold medal for"" is a complete and correct phrase that refers to the award given to the winner of a competition.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested