The phrase "a global argument" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing a debate, discussion, or reasoning that pertains to global issues or perspectives.
Example: "In the climate change debate, a global argument is necessary to address the interconnectedness of environmental policies across nations."
Alternatives: "a worldwide argument" or "an international argument".
This wasn't because he had a global argument for compatibilism.
Still, many regard such arguments as problematic for morality, particularly when developed as a "global" argument (Kahane, 2010).
It's a global argument: The U.S. has 4% of the world's population, 24% of its GDP and some 35% of its net worth.
Detailed discussion on potential reasons for the detrimental effects of preliminary tests is provided elsewhere [ 30, 41, 50]; therefore, only a global argument is given here: Exponentially distributed variables follow an exponential distribution, and uniformly distributed variables follow a uniform distribution.
According to Balls: "Europe is our best platform to win the global argument for an open and fair world".
Using a global variational argument, Del Pino and Felmer [11, 12] established the existence of multi-peak solutions having exactly k maximum points provided that there are k disjoint open bounded sets (Omega_{i}) such that (inf_{xinpartialOmega_{i}}V x)>inf_{xinOmega_{i}}V x)), each (Omega_{i}) having one peak concentrating at its bottom.
Hartshorne believes that the other arguments in his own global argument make the case for God's possible existence.
Hartshorne's versions of the cosmological, teleological (or design), moral, epistemic, and aesthetic arguments complete the set that make up the global argument (Viney 1985).
He declares that, far from being shamed by the recent discovery of errors in influential research by Harvard economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, austerity fans have recently gained "the upper hand" in the global argument over austerity.
The distinctive agendas outlined within the three themes identified in Dataset Two suggest that countries are in a position to contribute to such discussions, and that a constructive approach might be to balance these compelling global arguments against real, specific needs that have been identified by countries within the region.
There are probably global arguments to be made, at some point, about this incident.
