The phrase "a given proposition" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts involving logic, mathematics, or philosophy when referring to a specific statement or assertion that is assumed to be true for the sake of argument or analysis.
Example: "In this proof, we will assume a given proposition and explore its implications within the framework of set theory."
Alternatives: "a specific statement" or "an assumed proposition".
In propositional logic we are accustomed to assign a truth-value to a given proposition and in so doing we think of the truth-value as pertaining to the proposition itself and not to the immanent psychological act that affirms the proposition's truth.
Truth-value, in logic, truth (T or 1) or falsity (F or 0) of a given proposition or statement.
Readers seeking evidence for a given proposition won't have to wade through stage-setting, explanation, analysis, discussion, and review, which they may not need.
I call it a rack because I picture the series of propositions as series of hooks, and I picture the chain of evidence under a given proposition as a chain hanging from the hook.
It contrasts primarily with subjective probability, which refers to the degree of confidence that a rational agent should have in the truth of a given proposition (see probability theory).
The advantage of Boolean algebra is that it is valid when truth-values i.e., truth-values ialsity of a given proposition or logical statement—are used as variables instead of the numeric quantities employed by ordinary algebra.e
Firstly, any given proposition A can have only two degrees of verisimilitude: one in case it is false and the other in case it is true.
A proposition which results from such a substitution performed on the given proposition (on the given sentential form) is called a variant.
Different assets will be needed for the cross-functional activities required for effective selling of a given value proposition.
The second half of the course centers on debates in which teams of students will argue for and against a given policy proposition, with the aim of sharpening everyone's arguments on the basis of existing empirical evidence.
If there are more than five highest scoring propositions for a given term, the algorithm removes all propositions for this term.
