The phrase "a given level of performance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing specific standards or benchmarks that are expected or required in a particular context, such as in evaluations or assessments.
Example: "To qualify for the next stage of the competition, participants must demonstrate a given level of performance in their respective events."
Alternatives: "a specified level of performance" or "a defined level of performance."
Mental age, intelligence test score, expressed as the chronological age for which a given level of performance is average or typical.
We present necessary and sufficient conditions for a specific controller to stabilize or to achieve a given level of performance with all systems in such PE uncertainty set.
For a given level of performance, the effectiveness of the damper distribution obtained by means of different objective functions is also assessed.
Our goal here is to explore in a quantitative manner the relationship between performance, an individual measure, and success, a collective measure capturing the societal acknowledgement of a given level of performance.
(2) Controller validation results, where we present necessary and sufficient conditions for a controller to stabilize all models, or to achieve a given level of performance for all models, in such uncertainty set.
Today, wireless devices generally feature multiple radio access technologies (LTE, WIFI, WIMAX,...) to handle a rich variety of standards or technologies.These devices should be intelligent and autonomous enough in order to either reach a given level of performance or automatically select the best available wireless technology according to standards availability.
In this section, the design process to obtain an optimized fixed-point specification which guarantees a given level of performances is detailed.
For this task, railway standards have to prove that, even in case of failures, the system studied is able to guarantee a given level of performances expressed in the railway domain in terms of RAMS attributes (Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety).
This directly translates into the fact that at a given level of cognitive performance the degree of biomarker abnormality is generally higher in subjects with greater cognitive reserve.
One class of articles provides strong evidence that biomarkers are more abnormal at a given level of cognitive performance in subjects with higher cognitive reserve when compared with subjects with lower cognitive reserve.
Within this framework, a baseline difference in wagering criteria may be caused by the variance of the signal (word) distribution being greater than the noise (non-word) distribution, leading to a more prominent f(I| x) distribution following non-word responses and requiring more conservative criteria to maintain a given level of wagering performance.
