The phrase "a genuine object of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that is authentic or real in relation to a specific subject or context.
Example: "The painting is considered a genuine object of historical significance."
Alternatives: "an authentic example of" or "a true representation of".
While for Kant himself such traction is the only warrant that we are cognizing a genuine object, for Natorp the nexus of science and apparent reality is irrelevant to the spontaneous, legislating factor of science that is the activity of reason alone and therefore of paramount interest to philosophy.
The Ethics stands badly in need of some account of what finite modes are, after all, and IIIp4 provides at least one interesting way of distinguishing genuine objects from mere constructs: if the thing in question destroys itself it is not a genuine object.
The same holds for the desire for great wealth or for marks of fame, such as statues: they cannot provide the security that is the genuine object of the desire.
The presented beauty (of the building) is the genuine object — the dignitative — of the aesthetic emotion, while the building itself is the presupposed object of the emotion in question.
A genuine aesthetic object is not only something that gives consummatory experience but also helps to produce further satisfaction.
A radical option is to deny that any genuine object is involved (thus restricting ontology).
They are rather supposed to be merely possible events: experiences which are indistinguishable for the subject from a genuine perception of an object.
For the adverbialist rejects not just the idea that experience has a genuine act-object structure, but the idea that the character of experience is even a presentation as of ordinary things and qualities.
In a parallel way, desires present genuine objects in a subjective, personal sense as well as in an absolute sense.
