Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a general specificity" is not correct and is contradictory in nature.
Specificity refers to the quality of being specific, while generality refers to being broad or vague, making the combination illogical.
Example: "In discussing the topic, we need to avoid a general specificity that confuses the audience."
Alternatives: "a broad detail" or "a vague precision".
Exact(1)
Among the investigated antibody fragments we found three scFvs exhibiting a general specificity towards β-amyloid while two scFvs, PaD213-A5 and PaD233-E5, presented a tendency to better bind to certain forms of Aβ42.
Similar(59)
Those positions occupied by conserved residues within groups of proteins in a family sharing a common general specificity that differs between groups can be used as a proxy for the regions accounting for subfamily specificity.
Moreover, our findings introduce a novel antibody-based tool that, as a consequence of its general specificity for fibrillar conformations and its ability to function intracellularly, offers broad research potential for a variety of human amyloid diseases.
In this study, we evaluated the magnitude, general specificity and character of HIV specific CD8+ T cell responses at four time points across 2-9 years in 2 groups of chronically infected individuals separated on the basis of either effective antiretroviral suppression or ongoing replication of HIV.
Magnitude, general specificity and character of the HIV-specific CD8+ T cell response changed little over the study period.
As a general observation, specificity of all tests was higher in cubs, although only significantly so in the case of the Brock Test.
The general specificity information is obtained from the arrays is expressed in a regular expression form.
The tests were further compared with regard to general specificity, particularly cross-reactivity with rheumatoid factor, speed, simplicity, their ability to detect other species, storage requirements and general presentation.
In general, specificity estimates were higher and more consistent (range 78% to 100%) than sensitivity estimates (range 25% to 100%).
The fractional contribution of each individual HIV protein to overall magnitude indicated general specificity.
Repeat experiments with cRNA containing modified ATP supported the general specificity trend: unmodified ATP > 1 1 DAP A > all DAP (data not shown).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com