The phrase "a general gender" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing broad categories or classifications related to gender without specifying particular identities.
Example: "In the study, we examined the impact of societal norms on a general gender perception among adolescents."
Alternatives: "a broad gender" or "a common gender".
More recently, Caliendo and Kunn (2015) focus on self-employment schemes (start-up subsidies) and find a general gender gap in terms of effects of these innovative ALMPs, even though results may vary depending on the choice of the outcome variable.
Some of the gender variability could be explained by a general gender effect as the pattern is similar as seen in the normal population [ 22, 24].
We have therefore considered the risk of emphasizing decontextualized comments in our analysis by interpreting the comments as expressions of a general gender discourse rather than linking them to specific physicians.
In contrast to some prior studies that have shown a general gender symmetry trend for physical dating violence victimization among adolescents[ 7], our study showed a higher rate of physical violence among males (13.1%) compared to females (3.7%).
"I can't wear my own clothing," says Jonathan Anderson, a London menswear star who proposes progressive, aggressive ideas like ruffles and flounces, skirts for blokes and a general gender-bending bent.
In our analyses, we did not find any general gender differences regarding the interplay of reading attitude and reading software usage in class.
This is not just between conservative men and more liberal women, but, on some level, a more general gender divide and resentment.
The present studies did not find gender to significantly moderate the size-dominance relationship, although, as a general rule, gender is an important moderator of status perceptions.
In general, gender did not make a difference in effect ranking or relative value, but there was one exception; men attached a higher value to avoiding urinary retention than women (median $9.50 vs $1.50, p < 0.0001).
Moreover, the rheumatic diseases studied differ importantly in general gender epidemiology, reflected by a male predominance in the GA group versus a female predominance in the non-GA group.
The questionnaire prepared for the purpose of data collection contains four sections: (a) General aspects: gender of the participants, housing tenure the total number of people living in the housing and housing type (individual or collective).
