Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
A large knowledge gap was noted in a question regarding if a person must have many different partners to get HIV.
A large S-conformational gap was noted in G*C A vs G*C T for FABP (30% vs 18%) at n – 1, while no such difference (67% vs 68%) was observed for the FAF adduct.
Briefly, if the gaps were not present in the reference sequences, the gap was noted as a nematode specific deletion.
This knowledge gap was noted in a qualitative synthesis of parental perspectives on parent-child relationships by the same group [ 37] that included some studies of parents with preterm infants.
An increasing gap was noted between the actual requirements of a rapidly changing and increasingly flexible society and the skills that are taught at the university.
The widest gap was noted for LBP, which went from 4%to35%5%.
Where such data is available, it is duly noted; otherwise, the gap is noted and possible inferences are made from interpretation of data.
As is the purview of scoping reviews, we sought to assess whether sufficient research is available to warrant a more traditional systematic review on health toolkits and, where gaps are noted, to issue recommendations for future research on toolkit development and effectiveness.
Any mate-pair inconsistencies and sequence gaps were noted.
In addition to these general observations of gaps and research needs, several specific gaps are noted and outlined below.
In contrast, a minor non-return gapping of 0.05 mm was noted after ventrodorsal loading of single-staple constructs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com