The phrase "a future substantive" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing concepts, ideas, or topics that will be significant or relevant in the future.
Example: "In our discussion about educational reform, we must consider a future substantive that addresses the needs of diverse learners."
Alternatives: "an upcoming topic" or "a significant issue ahead".
This pilot study aimed to test key elements of a proposed future substantive RCT of the Living Life to the Full classes recruited from the community and delivered in the voluntary sector.
The talks, to be held at the border village of Panmunjom, are intended to set an agenda for future substantive discussions about the shelling, the sinking of a South Korean warship last March and the North's ongoing nuclear programs.
This contrast in policy development – innovative policy reform in BC and policy renewal with incremental changes in ON – might be an important difference when assessing future substantive and procedural successes and failures with respect to implementation and outcomes.
These models were used to estimate, and test the statistical significance of the within-group differences between time points and the between-group differences at each time point and the estimate of clinical effect and drop-out/non data retention rates used to provide a power calculation needed for the future substantive study.
Additionally, due to the possible financial benefits of low intensity interventions and the stepped care approach [ 27], an economic analysis will be included in the future substantive RCT.
This is a deal that potentially alters the atmosphere and clears the way for future substantive talks, which may or may not succeed.
However, there was a big variation in the amount of time spent searching which would suggest future substantive studies would have to be large to have sufficient power to detect a difference in this outcome.
The aim of the study was to test recruitment, retention, acceptability and ability to gather data, as well as inform the power calculation for the future substantive RCT.
We hope that this contribution will help others to avoid some of the mistakes that we (and others) made in the past, and that it will promote future substantive and sound studies.
The primary analysis in the future substantive RCT will, compare changes in PHQ-9 scores in those scoring 10 or more on the PHQ9 at 6 months between intervention groups in all participants.
