Suggestions(4)
Exact(15)
In addition, a future study that explores the reciprocal relationship between personal values and traits (i.e., innovativeness) would be beneficial, because this interactive relationship is an ongoing discussion in the literature.
A future study that derives questions from the categories we have identified would need to be conducted on a much larger, random sample of providers in order to determine generalizability to the population.
Notwithstanding this, a future study that used uniform (and potentially serial) late follow up and imaging would produce useful corroboration of our findings.
Conducting a future study that includes non index case-patients would produce a more accurate picture.
This pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility of a future study that will investigate potential predictors for PAH biomarkers and DNA damage among roofers.
Thus, in a future study that relies on OGTT markers, within-subject variability can potentially affect sample size requirements, study procedures, and overall study costs.
Similar(45)
We propose that for any future study that a more reasonable approach would be to 'treat until well' with a limit of 12 sessions, as residual symptoms may be linked to negative child outcomes.
Our model sets the stage for an expanded future study that could predict AoD propagation in patient-specific aortic geometries and better understand factors that may influence propensity for occurrence.
Reproducing the microscopic stress distribution in cytoskeletal components is an area of future study that will also incorporate pretension in actin filaments.
This provides an area for future study that may be explored in other datasets.
Whether such a pattern also applies to metatherians, possibly in combination with the geographic constraint hypothesis discussed further below, is a promising avenue for future study that will benefit from a broadening of focus beyond comparisons of carnivorous fossil metatherians.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com