The phrase "a further question raised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when introducing an additional inquiry or topic that has emerged from a previous discussion or context.
Example: "After reviewing the initial findings, a further question raised is whether the results can be replicated in different settings."
Alternatives: "an additional question posed" or "a subsequent question brought up".
As new forces propel diamantaires into the public eye and into business relationships that require more transparency and accountability, a further question is raised: Will diamond companies eventually head into the equity markets in search of more capital, visibility and prestige?
The ecological significance of endocrine disruption in fish is a further question frequently raised by researchers in this field because the implications of the intersex condition and reduced fertility, which are observed at the individual level, have not yet been demonstrated for wild populations.
A further question that is raised by the fact that both AOS are differentially localized concerns the physiological function of those PpAOSs.
The Netflix experience raises a further question: how much more information can be deanonymised from the taxi data set?
That all makes some sort of sense, but it does raise a further question: what prompted the second batch of returnees - Audrey, Milan, Etienne et al - to return?
But the Markinch closure raises a further question: is it so well suited to recognising market decline in time to provide a strategic response to it?
(Feenstra, 1989: 128 152) Unfortunately, however, this response only raises a further question, namely: if Christ's incarnation required his temporarily surrendering omniscience, then his later exaltation must have involved continued non-omniscience or the loss of his humanity.
For readers in Descartes' day, this claim would naturally raise a further question: assuming that these innate ideas concern "eternal truths" about God, matter, and mind, do these truths hold independently of God, or do they instead reflect the contents of God's own intellect?
Our result raises a further question about why FPC503 acquired and retained Et-LEE.
This raises a further question: who decides whether a particular piece of work is a scoping study or not?
