The phrase "a further inference is" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to introduce an additional conclusion or deduction based on previously presented information.
Example: "After analyzing the data, a further inference is that the trend will continue to rise in the coming months."
Alternatives: "an additional conclusion is" or "another deduction is".
Further inference was found in the tumor suppression gene, p53, with a new hypothesis of including the bovine PKM2 pathways for targeting the glycolysis preference in many types of cancerous cells, consistent with quantum metabolism models.
Finally, it should be noted that further inferences are possible from the toxicologically equivalent effect metric to other measures of health effect, such as if an adverse outcome pathway can quantify the linkage between a change in effect metric and the likelihood of an adverse health outcome.
Therefore, as a further inference of the model, smaller flocks should be selected for the annual serological survey in order to compensate for a negligible ABTSe in small flock size categories, and information campaigns should especially focus on farmers caring for larger flocks in order to increase DA and hence ABTSe.
A further advantage of supervised inference is that different types of data are informative about whether a functional link may exist, allowing practitioners to integrate data from diverse sources [ 1].
The importance of a population representation for inference is further reinforced in LIP because it contains an abundance of simultaneously expressed signals, for example eye position and saccade direction.
Whether free or un-free (standard) logic is the better formal model for natural language logical inference is a further question.
Therefore, noise was added to the expression values and further network inference was performed.
Further, Bayesian inference was performed with MrBayes using the rtREV + CAT model, four independent chains, one million cycles, tree sampling every 10 generations, and a burn-in value of 40%, which was adequate for Markov chain convergence.
Little, however, said that such an inference is incorrect.
However, replication is needed before further inference may be drawn from these observations.
