The phrase "a further argument is" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when introducing an additional point or reasoning in a discussion or analysis.
Example: "A further argument is that the proposed policy will lead to significant economic benefits for the community."
Alternatives: "an additional point is" or "another argument is".
A further argument is medical.
A further argument is then needed to see that every such local subgroup extends to an injective homomorphism of a Lie group to the group of invertible matrices.
To conclude that simply having incoherent credences is irrational, a further argument is needed showing that rationality demands that credences be linked to evaluations of bets as in the DBA, but there is little to suggest that graded degrees of belief must be so connected.
The physiology and psychology of addiction are imperfectly understood, but if addictiveness is truly the criterion for a ban, then booze and cigarettes should be banned, not cannabis and ecstasy.A further argument is that drug-taking is not a private matter, but has social consequences.
That is, if forfeiture is not tied to some limited positive desert, then further argument is needed to show that it is limited to a proportional punishment (Duff 2001 14 166).
Further argument is needed to explain why being genetically related to a greater rather than lesser degree generates obligations, especially where the elements of voluntary cause are clearly not applicable (which applies as much to aunts, cousins or other members of the wider family as it does to grandparents).
Finally, another limit of classical unsupervised methods also resides in their inability to accurately identify the actual number of clusters if no further argument is provided to the algorithm.
However I acknowledge that his third concern might, with further argument, be developed into a more troubling objection to such enhancements.
Further arguments are expected in a federal appeals court over a lawsuit from the National Mining Association challenging the 20-year ban on new uranium mining close to the Grand Canyon, imposed by the Obama administration in 2012.
1. Chalmers offers a further argument that is supposed to make use only of the diagonal intension, ignoring the horizontal intension: there is no need to elaborate here.
