Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Although both processes have their inherent advantages and drawbacks, a fundamental comparison of a component manufactured by these techniques has not been performed so far.
In metabolomics studies, the complexity of metabolic profiles is often simplified to a fundamental comparison of large inventories of key, phenotypically descriptive small molecules that distinguish between differing physiological states of interest at a single time point (e.g., "normal" vs "diseased").
Similar(58)
Herein, we have demonstrated a fundamental mechanical comparison between live cells and cells that were fixed with various concentrations of PFA.
Yet, the data cited as proof of rising prices does not make this very fundamental comparison and, therefore, does not measure changes in price by definition.
The second fundamental comparison in the first part of the original position is between the two principles and the principle of restricted utility, which is identical to Rawls's two principles except that the difference principle is replaced with a principle of average utility to regulate the distribution of wealth and income, constrained by a social minimum.
A number of publications have produced fundamental comparisons between RNA-seq and microarrays in an effort to illuminate the differences and similarities [ 5– 11].
The first part of the original position contains two fundamental comparisons between Rawls's two principles and utilitarian principles.
These results confirm that cellulase cocktail augmentation may be studied by ToF-SIMS, as well as more fundamental comparisons of enzyme action on extracted and unextracted lignocellulosic substrates.
Prior studies have made fundamental comparisons between RNA-seq and microarrays with focus on dynamic range of raw signal/read values and overlap in observed differentially expressed genes.
This demonstrates a fundamental difference in comparison to the optimization process with L/D-scaled penetrators where a much lower optimum velocity (2300 m/s) is obtained.
We address the efficiency problem of a fundamental operation, namely comparison, which is required to design any recommender system.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com