The phrase "a function of hazard" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing risk assessment, safety analysis, or statistical evaluations where hazard is a variable influencing outcomes.
Example: "The likelihood of an accident occurring is often considered a function of hazard and exposure levels."
Alternatives: "a factor of risk" or "an aspect of danger".
Given the allocation ratio and the number of events, power was computed as a function of hazard ratio.
For assessing potential adverse effects, indepth knowledge about Exposure-Dose-Response relationships is required to define a risk as a function of hazard and relevant exposure.
When toxicologists look at Risk being a function of Hazard x Exposure, increasing the acceptable safe exposure levels of chemicals in the formula (by eliminating the lower levels of exposure levels that would be harmful to children) would obviously protect some industrial chemicals/pesticides etc from regulation.
Fragilities, defined as the conditional probability of various levels of losses as a function of hazard demand (i.e. wind speed, spectral acceleration, ground snow load, or flood depth), of typical residential buildings with two levels of hazard resistance standards are generated.
Since 2001, 'green zones' also exist, corresponding to forest zones with a function of hazard control.
Risk is generally defined as a function of hazard, asset exposure, and consequence (Eq. 1; Fournier d'Albe, 1979).
Exposure is preferred to risk, since risk is a function of the hazard and the exposure to that hazard.
Models generally consider risk to be a function of the hazard (toxicity) and exposure (dose).
(B ) Subjective hazard rate, estimated from direct fits of choice data by the normative model with hazard rate as a free parameter, plotted as a function of objective hazard rate.
In DRR, risk is generally presented as a function of both hazard and vulnerability (e.g. Wisner et al. [2004]), but recent DRR research has tended to focus on the latter (e.g. Hewitt [1983], [2000], [2013]; Cutter [1996]; Bankoff [2001]; Gaillard [2010]) – and within this, physical, biological and social vulnerability (e.g. Brooks [2003]).
These functions provide quantitative estimates of impact intensity as a function of volcanic hazard intensity.
