The phrase "a fully informed judgment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the importance of having all necessary information before making a decision or forming an opinion.
Example: "In order to make a fully informed judgment about the policy changes, we need to review all relevant data and stakeholder feedback."
Alternatives: "an informed decision" or "a well-informed assessment".
The public cannot make a fully informed judgment about the contract, because both the Treasury and Department of Health have refused to release key information, despite repeated requests under the Freedom of Information Act.
As Mr. Connaughton puts it, For me, what is deplorable is not the Justice Department's failure to bring charges, but its failure to be adequately dedicated and organized either to make the cases or reach a fully informed judgment that no case could be made.
This may impair their ability to make a fully informed judgment on their patients' condition and their appreciation of the degree of discomfort, loss of dignity and family distress being experienced while treatment is continued.
As a result, analysts community-wide are unable to make fully informed judgments about the information they receive, relying instead on nonspecific source lines to reach their assessments.
They also don't always provide enough information for clinicians to make a fully informed hypertension diagnosis.
How would a court approach deal price in appraisal when the triggering transaction "was approved by a fully informed, uncoerced vote of the disinterested shareholders," so that under Corwin, the business judgment rule applies?
In 2014, in KKR Financial,16 the Delaware Court of Chancery reasoned that in transactions not involving a controlling stockholder, the business judgment rule presumption should apply if the board's decision is approved by a fully informed, uncoerced vote of a majority of disinterested stockholders, even if a majority of the directors approving the transaction are not independent or disinterested.
Under Corwin, the business judgment rule applies to judicial review of transactions that are not otherwise subject to the entire fairness standard so long as the transaction was "approved by a fully informed, uncoerced vote of the disinterested stockholders". See id. at *9 (quoting Corwin v. KKR Fin. Hldgs. LLC, 125 A.309304, 309 (Del. 2015)).
Can't a better answer come from placing power in the hands of a fully informed consumer?
Or, as Weddington insists, did a fully informed McCorvey agree to be part of something larger than herself?
