The phrase "a fully constituted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are referring to something that has been completely established or formed, such as a committee or organization.
Example: "The board is now a fully constituted body, ready to make decisions on behalf of the organization."
Alternatives: "a fully formed" or "a fully established".
Given Sri Lanka's record of determined obfuscation, the next step must be a fully constituted international criminal investigation into the events of 2009.
Amid the roar of the traffic, the community of Travellers has set up a fully constituted Tenants' and Residents' Association (TRA) – one of just a dozen operating across 320 council-run Gypsy and Traveller sites in England and Wales.
The amendment would declare that a fully constituted person pops into existence at conception.
In Henry's lexicon, these two moments indicate respectively the exemplar, which is the divine idea, and the exemplatum (also called ideatum), which is an essence fully constituted in its quidditative content and so able to be placed in act.
There he argues that although each moral property is distinct from any natural property or properties, still each instantiation of a moral property is fully constituted (or, as he sometimes puts it, 'realized') by some concatentaion of natural properties (see Shafer-Landau 2003 76-788).
Mr. Obama directed Mr. Clapper to consider declassifying more information and last week met with a civil liberties oversight board that has just been fully constituted more than four years after his inauguration.
In 1890, Alexandria became the first fully constituted municipality in Egypt.
With the swearing-in of the judges, "the special court is now fully constituted," Behrooz Sadry, the United Nations' acting special representative in the country, said at the oath-taking ceremony.
They are co-chairs of PCAST, which has not yet been fully constituted.
You're out of luck, for now; the AAMC site offers this functionality, but the database is not yet fully constituted.
Why, though, should we suppose that this necessitation thesis (that if one trope is fully constituted by another trope, then it necessarily is) is true?
