The phrase "a full peer" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe someone who has equal status or authority in a particular context, often in professional or academic settings.
Example: "In our collaborative project, each member is considered a full peer, contributing equally to the decision-making process."
Alternatives: "an equal partner" or "a complete equal".
If failing schools don't improve quickly, they will be shut down and reopened under a new principal, with a full peer evaluation of every teacher, intensive training for those who need it and fair ways to improve or remove low-performing teachers.
In order to ensure that we publish only high-quality research papers and review articles, all submitted manuscripts (including invited papers) will go through a full peer review process.
All researchers wishing to use Social Science One Facebook datasets must submit proposals to specific RFPs and undergo a full peer review process to be selected and receive a research data and funding award.
The nine reviews all underwent a full peer review prior to publication.
AllMyData, unique among the group, is a full peer-to-peer solution with "grid storage".
We assume that a full peer-reviewed presentation of Professor Mikisch's methods, data, and results will be available in due course, and look forward to reading his findings.
The partnership, the GuideHop team says, is designed to give customers a full integrated peer-to-peer experience, where anyone can plan an expedition by finding a place to stay through iStopOver, and discovering nearby activities with GuideHop.
A Cochrane review examined abstract publication rates of all medical subspecialties and reported a mean full (peer-reviwed journal) publication rate of 44.5%, with higher rates of 63.1% for randomised or controlled clinical trials.
Anyone can send in a paper, and submissions don't get full peer review.
The pathology findings from all studies were subjected to a full pathology peer review.
But what would prevent such journals from adopting a policy of sending reports of replications, failed or otherwise, for full peer review and, if accepted, publishing the abstract of the paper in the journal and the full version online?
