The phrase "a full pair" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as card games, fashion, or discussions about completeness in a set.
Example: "In poker, having a full pair can significantly increase your chances of winning the hand."
Alternatives: "a complete set" or "a complete pair".
With a full pairing audiotactile configuration (Experiment 1), we varied the audiotactile asynchronies from −75 ms (beep leading tap) to 75 ms (beep trailing tap) in the odd numbered pairs, while keeping the even numbered pairs synchronous.
We also performed a full pair-wise genome scan using the regression models described below.
It then uses TM-Score (Zhang and Skolnick, 2004b) to perform a full pair-wise comparison between these models.
It performs a full pair-wise genome scan to detect interactions involving SNPs with or without significant marginal effects using appropriate Bonferroni-corrected significance thresholds.
In total, this amounts to less than 7% of the time required for computation of a full pair-wise distance matrix (1533 seconds).
Considering 300 000 SNPs, a full pair-wise genome scan perform 4.5E+10 association tests and thus the 5% genome-wide threshold is 11.95 (ie, −log10 0.05/4.5E+10)).
The scatter plot in Figure 2 shows the times required to calculate a full pair-wise distance matrix directly from the sequence data (red) for each entry in the HOMSTRAD/Pfam dataset.
A major hurdle for analysing epistasis in GWA studies was the lack of fast methods to enumerate billions of interaction tests in a full pair-wise genome scan to map different types of epistasis (eg, with or without main effects) while keeping false-positive rates under control.
The minimal extra cost of producing these data structures (compared to storing all possible triangles) often gives a large payoff: for example, the knowledge of which edges have already been processed allows EdgeSearch to iterate through edges in O(m)* O g) = O g) time rather than a full pair-wise O(m) = O g).
