The phrase "a frequent argument in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a common point or claim made within a particular context, such as a debate, article, or academic paper.
Example: "A frequent argument in the climate change debate is that immediate action is necessary to prevent catastrophic consequences."
Alternatives: "a common assertion in" or "a regular point in".
Whatever the availability might have been, before or even during the sixteenth century, of damages in debt for losses due to non- payment, a frequent argument in favor of the action of assumpsit was that it allowed recovery of such damages.
It's a frequent argument in our house, as more and more of her friends host and/or attend sleepovers, and she gets her fair share of invitations.
A frequent argument in favor of a pre-cellular MRCA, also invoked in the present manuscript, is based on the different lipid and cell wall composition of archaea, bacteria and eukaryotes.
The lack of formal or in-person counseling is a frequent argument against unsupervised HIV self-testing.
A frequent argument against Medicaid expansion is there aren't enough doctors accepting Medicaid patients to go around.
"What happens when the next con man comes along?" is a frequent argument by Stephen Kay against Leslie's release.
Another frequent argument in favor of the ABM treaty is that an antiballistic missile system cannot be foolproof, and even if it did work 95% of the time, the 5% of enemy missiles that got through would be enough to destroy our major cities.
The frequent argument in favor of covering is that it helps more people of color get a seat at the table.
One frequent argument in favor of maintaining the ABM treaty is that there have been failures in our tests of an antiballistic missile defense system.That would have been a good argument in the late 1950s for canceling our missile programs and space vehicles because they blew up with regularity.
In another study conducted in the same penitentiary, Kerley, Matthews, and Blanchard (2005) found that believing in a higher power provided a 70% reduction in the likelihood of frequent arguments in prison.
The most frequent arguments yesterday in favor of repeal were that city residents did not realize the damage they were causing when they adopted term limits in 1993 and then rejected a Council proposal in 1996 to revise the limit by allowing members to serve three four-year terms.
