The phrase "a former contracts" is not correct in English.
It should be "a former contract" or "former contracts" depending on the context. You can use it when referring to a previous agreement or arrangement that has been made, but it needs to be grammatically correct.
Example: "She was involved in a former contract with the company that ended last year."
Alternatives: "a previous contract" or "an earlier agreement."
Several of those highly classified intelligence-gathering programs were exposed via leaks from a former contract worker for the National Security Agency.
In a little-noticed case last December, a former contract linguist for the F.B.I., Shamai Kedem Leibowitz, pleaded guilty to leaking five classified documents to a blogger.
Since June 5th, the Guardian had been publishing top-secret digital files provided by Edward Snowden, a former contract employee of the National Security Agency.
The question was developed by a former contract employee of the company based in Itasca, Ill., that helps the state develop its test.
The witness, Ann Louise Bardach, a journalist who is a former contract writer for The New York Times, testified on Thursday that Luis Posada Carriles admitted during interviews in 1998 that he had sent the fax to associates.
"They know how to make vehicles, but they don't know how to develop them".One of his employees is Alan Wall, 54, a former contract engineer at Chrysler who lost his job during the recession.
EL PASO — A defense lawyer tried to discredit a former contract writer for The New York Times in the perjury trial of a Cuban exile here on Monday, forcing her to defend a 1998 front-page article that said the defendant had taken credit for orchestrating a series of bombings in Havana.
A former contract linguist for the F.B.I. was sentenced in May to 20 months in prison for disclosing secret documents to a blogger, and a veteran National Security Agency official is awaiting trial on charges of sharing classified information with a reporter for The Baltimore Sun.
EL PASO — A defense lawyer raised questions Tuesday about tape recordings that have become a key piece of evidence in the perjury trial of a militant Cuban exile here, asking a former contract journalist for The New York Times about why there is a four-minute gap on one tape, why better recordings were not made and why the original recordings were not better protected.
The defense assertion came after the witness, Ann Louise Bardach, a longtime journalist and a former contract writer for The New York Times, said that the defendant, Luis Posada Carriles, had talked at length about his role in the bombings, which led to the death of an Italian tourist.
