Sentence examples for a formalized language from inspiring English sources
In discussing a formalized language it is usually necessary to employ a second, more powerful language.
First, let a matter for investigation be circumscribed by a formalized language L adequate for discussing it.
But this route is only viable for a language which is structurally described, e.g., a formalized language.
Although not all philosophical references to preference make use of formal tools, preferences are almost always assumed to have structural properties of a type that is best described in a formalized language.
It is equally obvious that if one has at hand a notion of model-theoretic validity for a formalized language which is based on a minimally reasonable notion of structure, then all logical truths (of that language) will be model-theoretically valid.
A logical approach toward this problem consists in enriching a formalized language \(L\) with a truth predicate \(T\), to be applied to sentences of \(L\) – or, even better, to be applied to sentences of the extension \(L_{T}\) of \(L\) with the predicate \(T\).
For a fixed formalized language, a definition of denotation of names in that language is possible, although there is no definition available for denotation in general except by semantical terms, such as connotation, that are closely related to it.
In addition, this study defined collaboration activity with formalized language and proposed a method to evaluate the collaboration effects of R&D project teams and a model of team knowledge collaboration effects.
This highly formalized language was elaborated by generations of oral poets to minimize the conscious effort needed to compose new poems and memorize existing ones.
Instead, they have mainly focused on the increasing use of formalized language, knowledge, and employment requirements for permanent residence and citizenship since the late 1990s (Goodman, 2014; Joppke, 2007).
Using another terminology, this means that, if one builds one's calculus with care, one will be convinced that the derivability characterization of logical truth for formulae of the formalized language will be sound with respect to logical truth.
