a flagrant violation of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a flagrant violation of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an obvious and blatant breach of rules, laws, or standards. Example: "The company's actions were deemed a flagrant violation of environmental regulations, leading to severe penalties."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"This is a flagrant violation of privacy," said the representative.

Independent

"This is a flagrant violation of privacy," they told Buzzfeed.

Independent

His conduct was a flagrant violation of biosafety standards.

The New York Times

A spokesperson for Lawrence said at the time: "This is a flagrant violation of privacy.

Independent

A spokesperson for Lawrence said: "This is a flagrant violation of privacy.

Independent

Russia's foreign ministry decried "a flagrant violation of the right to peaceful assembly".

The Economist

Jennifer Lawrence's representatives called the leak "a flagrant violation of privacy".

Independent

The UNHCR said at the time that the expulsion was "a flagrant violation of international law".

The Guardian

In addition, Panama's National Legislative Council condemned the transfer as a "flagrant violation" of the treaty.

The New York Times

Mr. Obama singled out Russia's annexation of Crimea as a flagrant violation of the international order.

The New York Times

The resolution reiterated that Israeli settlement was a "flagrant violation" of international law.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a flagrant violation of", ensure the context clearly establishes the rule, law, or standard that is being violated. This provides clarity and strengthens the impact of your statement.

Common error

While "a flagrant violation of" is strong, avoid overuse in emotionally charged contexts where a more nuanced description might be more effective. Overuse can diminish the phrase's impact and credibility.

Linguistic Context

A flagrant violation of functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It denotes an action or situation that blatantly disregards established rules or laws. Ludwig shows its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Formal & Business

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a flagrant violation of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to describe an obvious breach of rules or laws. Ludwig AI confirms that it is suitable for various contexts, especially news and formal writing. While grammatically correct, the term should be used judiciously, avoiding overuse in contexts where a more subtle description might be more suitable. Common alternatives include "a blatant disregard for" or "an egregious breach of". Its frequent occurrence in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian underscores its acceptance in formal discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a blatant disregard for

This alternative focuses on the disrespectful and intentional nature of ignoring a rule or law.

an egregious breach of

This emphasizes the shocking and outrageous nature of the violation.

a gross infringement on

This highlights the severe limitation or intrusion on someone's rights or freedom.

a severe contravention of

This suggests a serious and formal violation of a rule or law.

a conspicuous defiance of

This emphasizes the open and deliberate nature of the violation, showing a clear challenge to authority.

an open flouting of

This phrase highlights the public and shameless nature of the violation.

a patent infringement of

This focuses on the clear and undeniable nature of violating a right or law.

a wilful transgression against

Highlights the deliberate and intentional nature of the violation.

a direct contravention of

Emphasizes the clear and unambiguous nature of the violation.

a stark contravention of

Highlights the clear and undeniable contrast between the action and the rule being violated.

FAQs

How can I use "a flagrant violation of" in a sentence?

You can use "a flagrant violation of" to describe an action that clearly and obviously breaks a rule, law, or agreement. For example: "The company's actions were a flagrant violation of environmental regulations." The Ludwig AI confirms the correct grammatical usage.

What are some synonyms for "a flagrant violation of"?

Alternatives include "a blatant disregard for", "an egregious breach of", or "a gross infringement on" depending on the specific context.

What distinguishes "a flagrant violation of" from a simple violation?

The term "flagrant" implies that the violation is not only obvious but also intentional and often disrespectful. It suggests a deliberate disregard for the rule or law, making it more serious than a simple, unintentional violation.

Is "a flagrant violation of" suitable for formal writing?

Yes, "a flagrant violation of" is appropriate for formal writing, particularly in legal, journalistic, and academic contexts where the emphasis on clarity and precision is paramount. The numerous examples provided by Ludwig confirm this.